9/11 - Crime Of The Century

Add a Comment

21 Comments

Comment by joe rossini on June 6, 2009 at 6:21am

Visit 911aletheia

Comment by joe rossini on June 2, 2009 at 11:29am

Totally agree there withya Mark. Part of it, some.

I try to imagine the plane crashing into the one side of the building, the one engine fitting perfectly through a window, being ripped from its mounting, thrusting through the office on an almost perfect horizontal angle - no bouncing - no resistance from a pillar or such, crashing out of a window on the other side....again, a perfect fot and with all the momentum it had coming in, goes out the other side and flies all the way over to the corner it landed on. That's a long way to go for an 8000lb. jet engine. To believe it, I would have to have skid marks, a big fucking dent in a wall and a few other tell tale clues. Rumor has it, an eyewitness said the engine landed on a car. On a car?

Disclaimer: I'm not saying it didn't happen. All I say is, this shit is very hard to swallow.

Comment by Mark on June 2, 2009 at 11:01am

It doesn't seem possible to me, Curt. And the fancy-shmancy asswipes who dream up all sorts of technical garbage to prove it could be possible are really a nuisance. If you stretch the parameters of reality far enough, you can make anything seem possible. But when they have to do that to explain EVERYTHING, then they're part of the cover-up.

Comment by joe rossini on June 2, 2009 at 10:19am

Just another day in the office. BORing. I hate cubicals. Speaking of offices, cubicals and such..........

The was taken in one of the WTC twin towers. Can you imagine a 767 crashing into the WTC at such a speed that one of its engines came out the other side ?

Here's one photo of the jet engine:

I chose this one because of the scaffolding. More are available at the source of these; http://home.att.net/~south.tower/STengine1.htm

What do you think? Could it be real? Could the ca. 8000lb. jet engine travel through the office floor, out the other side and all the way to the corner of Church St. and 24 Murray St. ?

I think this part is crucial, would love to hear your thoughts on this.

Comment by joe rossini on May 31, 2009 at 9:10am

Weird, I haven't discussed 9/11 for ages. The big slpit over at st911 turned me off and at the same time, I got so wrapped up in other things, I kinda lost track. Very little progress has been made, I'm sorry to say but the level of awareness has greatly increased.

fyi, some of the most prominent amongst the movement have reached out for more of us to participate in their discussions. Membership is by invitation only. I would love to invite each and every one of you but I can't. Perhaps Mark can, if Mark chooses. So ya better be nice to Mark, right ;-)

Comment by joe rossini on May 11, 2009 at 11:56am

2001 anthrax attacks

The anthrax letters were a dead giveaway, in my eyes. Once, while still too young to know better and old enough to serve my country, I put my right fist through a window. The injuries were so severe, I had to learn to write with my left hand. I was a SP4 in a weapons systems repair centre and as part of my daily routine, I had to fill out spare parts order forms - by hand. Luckily for me, after one day off work and with my right hand all bandaged up, arm in a sling, my Sgt. told me to either learn to write with my left hand or lose my job in his Dept. I looked at him as if he was crazy but after a few strokes, I had it under control. The first few days, my handwriting looked a lot like the writing on the anthrax letters. It's obvious.

Another thing that was immediately obvious was the booman the media was using. Saddam Hussein had a reputation of using chemical weapons. The shoe almost fit. And then the 'New Scientist Article;

'The DNA sequence of the anthrax sent through the US mail in 2001 has been revealed and confirms suspicions that the bacteria originally came from a US military laboratory. The data released uses codenames for the reference strains against which the attack strain was compared. The two reference strains that appear identical to the attack strain most likely originated at the US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick (USAMRIID), Maryland. The new work also shows that substantial genetic differences can emerge in two samples of an anthrax culture separated for only three years. This means the attacker's anthrax was not separated from its ancestors at USAMRIID for many generations.'

Anthrax was a well known term in the military. Not in my time but later on and I still had friends in the Army who had been inocculated against anthrax attacks. The vaccinations were mandatory. And it made you sick. Not the kind of sick that would go away after a week or two. The feeling stayed on for a longer period of time. Pulling it together, if I'm not mistaken, this one friend who was an E7 at the time told me he had been vaccinated just before being flown out to Kuwait. He said he felt sick the whole time through and he wasn't sure if that was why he still felt sick after returning from Iraq. We both wondered why the Army was called back after reaching Basra. What year was that? I know it was prior to 9/11 and prior to the domestic anthrax attacks. From wiki (link above);

"November 7, 1997: The Army awards a $322 million contract to DynPort Vaccine Company, LLC, a joint venture formed specifically between Reston-based DynCorp and British-based Porton International, to develop and store a warehouse of vaccines to protect soldiers from biological warfare. About 45 percent of the 10-year contract is to be conducted at Fort Detrick in Frederick, Maryland."

There's a political connection there. Somewhere.

Comment by Mark on May 11, 2009 at 11:16am

Now that you point it out, David, even I can see it. ;)

Comment by David Sugar on May 11, 2009 at 9:53am

I do not believe any clear understanding of 9/11 can emerge without considering the follow-up attack with military grade Anthrax. The two seem deeply interlinked, and the latter provides further evidence of the former being a false flag.

Imagine for a moment sitting around in Cheney's office, say on the evening of Sept. 10th. Nobody would know how the American public would actually react, until the events unfolded. If we imagine someone like, say, Mr. Cheney, having already committed to such an operation to use terror to direct American public opinion, with an uncertain outcome, surely it would also make sense to have additional operations planned and operational for the months ahead.

Taken into this light, the idea for using Anthrax as a follow-up measure, perhaps with orders executed even before the planes hit, does have a certain logic to it. That the attack on the towers effectively invoked panic in the population as a whole, the Anthrax attacks seemed much more focused on just two crucial targets that would need to be blinded for an executive legal coup of sorts to successfully occur; the media and congress.

If we do speculate along these lines, though, perhaps 911 was more successful than was expected, as it certainly overshadowed the Anthrax attacks even a month later, and perhaps made further operations unnecessary.

The story the government would like to sell is that some patsy scientist had been holding onto Military Anthrax presumably for sometime and was just waiting for an event he had no foreknowledge of whatsoever to then use it. Alternately, we are asked to assume he ran back to the lab immediately after the attack, deciding then to acquire it, and finding it immediately available and so easily accessible. Neither seems rather plausible, does it?

Comment by joe rossini on May 11, 2009 at 9:08am

Yip, David's right and I can't understand how I could've overlooked that except that I'm not a fan for details. Speaking of details, three details about 9/11 keep the discussion going, not matter how hard some have tried to take it in all kinds of directions including down. A) it didn't happen the way they said it happened, B) everything was done to enable the event, very little to prevent it and C) they wanted it to happen because the "new pearl harbour" was the key to turning the clock ahead, advancing the game called "rule the world and get rich doing so in five easy steps".

Now get this; if you wanna go even further into detail about which colour aluminum is when hot enough to melt AND exposed to air, well, go for it. Keep all channels open and don't forget the basics. We're all in this together.

Comment by David Sugar on May 10, 2009 at 4:04pm

Yes...I was simply striving for accuracy. Something that is not desired in his story :). Remember the radio station raid was meant to create a reason for starting war, while the Reichstag fire was a key means to remove political and social opposition by enabling a kind of "state of emergency" that allowed Hitler to gain control of the state. 9/11 was a single false flag event that contained both these objectives.

• 1
• 2
• 3